The Reality of Using Electronic Platforms by Faculty Members in Teaching Islamic Sciences

Bentte Abdul Aziz Bin Saud Al-Hamad, Hanan

doi:10.21608/jsre.2019.57263

The Reality of Using Electronic Platforms by Faculty Members in Teaching Islamic Sciences

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Hanan Bentte Abdul Aziz bin Saud Al-Hamad

10.21608/jsre.2019.57263

Abstract

The study aimed at uncovering the reality of the use of electronic teaching platforms by faculty members in teaching the forensic sciences in terms of identifying the platforms used by faculty members, determining the degree of their employment for these platforms in the teaching of forensic sciences, and taking into account the personal characteristics of members such (teaching experience, number of training courses obtained in the field of use of e-learning platforms, academic level and age),. The study also attempted to assess the degree of actual use of these platforms, and finally to investigate the obstacles to their use that face the faculty of Islamic jurisprudence at the university. In order to achieve the objectives of this study, the researcher used the descriptive method in his survey method, using the questionnaire tool. The study population consisted of all 113 members of the faculty of Islamic Sciences at the Faculty of theology, at the Islamic University of Imam Muhammad bin Saud (113) In the sample method.The results of the study showed that the members of the faculty of Shari'a sciences used the most important electronic educational platforms (sometimes), and the most important of these platforms (Blackboard), and the degree of employment of these platforms (medium), where the most important aspects of employment in the use of the program of educational programs or training provided by (49%).The frequency of their use was low, and there was an agreement (neutral) between them on the obstacles that limit Their use of these platforms, the most important of which is: the lack of provision of educational techniques Laboratories for Shari'ah Sciences by the Department.

Keywords

References

Al Khalili, K. Y., Ahmed, E. W. (2014). Effects of Moodle as an E-Learning Tool on Enhancing Study Skills of Bahraini Student Teachers. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences - Bahrain, vol. 15, p. 2, 674 - 695.

Benta D., Bologa G., Dzitac S., Dzitac I.,(2015) University Level Learning and Teaching via E-Learning Platforms, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 55, Pages 1366-1373

Bin Zhao. (2014). Construction of Independent Learning Network Platform for Engineering Students based on Metacognition. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences - Bahrain, vol. 15, p 3, 559 - 575.

Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external varia- bles in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management. 6(43), 706- 7170

Carey Jewitt, Christina Hadjithoma-Garstka, Wilma Clark, Shakuntala Banaji and Neil Selwyn (2011). School use of learning platforms and associated technologies, London Knowledge Lab، Institute of Education – University of London، march.

Carey Jewitt, others (2010), School use of learning platforms and associated technologies, March 2010

Easy Class. (2018). Retrieved on: 18/7/2018. At https://www.easyclass.com/about

Edmodo (2015).easyclass about. Retieved 2/4/2018. From https://www.edmodo.com.

Gabriela Carmen Oproiu (2015)A Study about Using E-learning Platform (Moodle) in University Teaching Process, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 180, Pages 426-432

Garloch, S. (2015). Is small beautiful? Online education looks beyond the MOOC. Harvard Magazine. Retrieved 28/3/2017 from http://harvardmagazine.com/2015/07/is-small-beautiful

Heirdsfield, A. Walker، S،. Tambyah، M،. & Beutel، D. (2011). Blackboard as an online learning environment: what do teacher education students and staff think?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education، 36(7)، 1-17.

Internet World Stats (2018). Internet World Stats: usage: and Population. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Itmazi,l & Fenchichi,A.(2012).First International Conference in Information and Communinologies for Education and Training.TunIsia:Phillips IntERNATIONAL Genter of Journalists(n.d). About ICFJ. https://www.icfj.org/

Keng-Boon Ooi, Jun-Jie Hew, Voon-Hsien Lee(2018) Could the mobile and social perspectives of mobile social learning platforms motivate learners to learn continuously?, Computers & Education, Volume 120,، Pages 127-145.

Leask, M & Younie, S. (2013). Implementing learning platforms in schools and universities: lesson frim England and Wales. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(2), 247-266.

Li, X. (2004). Dreamweaver MX in Chinese 2004 Platinum Teaching, Beijing: Ordnance Industry Press, Beijing KehaiElectronic Publishing, 192-202.

Mei. H. (2013). The Construction of a Web -Based Learning Platform the Perspective of Computer Support for Collaborative Design. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications,3(4), 105 -112.

Mtebe S Joel,(2015) Learning Management System success: Increasing Learning Management System usage in higher education in sub-Saharan AfricaInternational Journal ofEducation and Development using Information and Communication Technology(IJEDICT, Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp. 51-64University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Santanach, F., Gener M. & Almirall, M (2010). The Campus Project: e-learning tools and platforms integration. Retrieved at 23/12/2017 from: http://www.researchgat.net/publication/241110.

Smrithi Rekha, S. Venkatapathy (2015)Understanding the Usage of Online Forums as Learning Platforms, Procedia Computer Science, Volume 46, Pages 499-506.

Ted. (2016).ideas worth spreading. Retieved 2l/4/2018 from https://www.ted.com

zhao du,others(2012). Interactive and Collaborative E-Learning Platform with Integrated Social Software and Learning Management System, international conference on information technology and software engineering.

Zhao, dingyang(2011). E-Learning Platform and Modern Education, International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, Vol. 1, No. 2, June.