The Efficiency of Using Electronically Differentiated Leaning Strategy in Teaching Math to Rise the Educational Attainment of Third Grade Intermediate School Female Students.

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Abstract


Study Abstract.       
          The study objective is to identify the efficiency of using elctronically differentiated leaning strategy in home works follow-up on the educational attainment of math for the Third Grade Intermediate school female students. To obtain this, a study has been conducted using the experimental approach that based on the quasi-experimental design. The teacher guide was prepared to use the electronically differentiated leaning strategy in the making and follow-up of home works, while the student guide was prepared to use the electronically differentiated leaning strategy in home works. Then, the researcher started a group in Kubbu website. A random sample has been select, from The Forty Fifth intermediate school for girls, consisting of 60 students. Then, they were divided into two groups: a control group (Whose home works follow-up was in the traditional way) and an experimental group (whose home works follow up used the electronically differentiated leaning through kubbu website). The study sample has been tested prior and posterior with the achievement test that has been prepared. Statistical treatments have been conducted to examine the study hypothesis by using arithmetic mean and the standard deviation. As well as using T-Test.
          The result of the study showed cased an improvement in the educational attainment of math of higher and lower levels for Third Grade Intermediate female students using the electronically differentiated leaning.
          Finally, the researcher conclude with a set recommendations such as the necessity for the educational course authorities and math books authors to take in consideration the electronically differentiated leaning strategy in the structure and development of the educational course.           

Keywords


-          Abigil ,M,and &Ebele,C,O,(2013),Effect of diffect of diffectiated instruction on the academic achievement of Nigerian secondary school biology students. Educational Research (ISSN:2141-5161) Vol.4(7)pp. 555-560.
-          Abu Bakar, K .Tarmizi, R. Ayub, A.& Yuns,A.(2009). Effect of utilizing Geometer's Sketchpad on Performance and mathematical thinking of seconday mathematics learners : An initial exploration. International Journal of Eaucation and Information Technologies, 1(3),Pp20-27. .
-          Burns, J. (2004) . An Analysis of the Implementation of Differentiated Instruction In A Middle school An High school and The Effects of Implementation on Curriculum Content And Student Achievement .Published thesis PhD Seton Hall university .
-          Campbell , B . (2008) . Handbook of differentiated Instruction Using the Multiple Intelligences lesson Plans and More , Boston : Pearson Education , Inc .
-          Chalupa , E. (2004) . The Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Fifth Grade Gifted and Talented Students . Unpublished master's thesis . University of Graceland .
-          Gilbert , D. (2012). Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Student Achievement in Reading . ERIC Document Reproduction service No . (EDERIC Document Reproduction service No . (ED522660) Retrieved on September 2017 from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED540093 .
-          Hall , tracey , et al . (2009) . Implication for UDL implementation. UDL. America.
-          Heacox , D . (2001) Differentiating Instruction in the regular classroom: how to reach and teach All learners  , grades 3-12 by free spirit publishing .
-          Hodge , P.H. (1997) .An Analysis of the Impact of a Prescribed Staff development program in differentiated instruction on student achievement and the attitudes of teachers and parents toward that instruction .,Published thesis – EdD .University of Alabama .
-          Hohenwarter, M. & Lavicza, Z. (2007).Mathematics teacher evelopment with ICT towards an, International Geo Gebra Institute. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27(3), Pp 49-54 University of Northampton, UK. BSRIM .How to reach and teach ALL learners, grades 3-12 by. Free Spirit Publishing.
-          Koeze , p . (2007) . Differentiated Instruction : The Effect On Student Achievement In An Elementary School . published thesis EdD . Eastern Michigan.
-          MacAdamis , S. (2001) .Teachers Their Instruction to Meet a Variety of Student Needs . Journal of staff Development , 22(2),1-5.
-          Muthomi , M . & Mbugua ,Z. (2014) . Effectiveness of Differentiated Instruction on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics .International Journal of Applied Science and Technology , Vol . 4,No .1,pp 116-122.
-          National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).Principles Standards for Sch Mathematics. Reston, VA:NCTM.
-          National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2008).The Role of Technology in Teaching end Learning of Mathematics, Reston, VA:NCTM
-          Swift,M.K. (2009) . The Effect Differentiated Instruction in social Student Performance . Unpublished master's thesis , University of Wisconsin– Stout , United States of America .
-          Tomlinson , C. (1999) The Differentiated Classroom : Responding to the Needs of All Learners , Virginia : ASCD . 
-          Tomlinson , C. (2001) How to Differentiate Instruction In Mixed  ability Classroom , Virginia : ASCD
-          Tomlinson , C. (2005) The Differentiated Classroom : Responding to the Needs of All Learners  , Virginia : ASCD .
-          Tomlinson, C. (1995). Deciding to Differentiate Instruction in the Middle School : One school's Journey. Gifted Child uarterly, 9(2),77-114.
-          Valiande,S.&Koutselini,M.(2009).Application and Evaluation of Differentiation instruction in mixed Ability classrooms,4th Hellenic observatory phd symposinum, LSE 2