A Proposed Vision for Developing Financing University Education System in Egypt in light of Performance-Based Funding Formula

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Comparative education & educational administration Department, Faculty of Education, Tanta University

Abstract

The current research aims at developing the system of Financing University Education in Egypt in the light of the formula of performance-based funding by presenting a proposed vision of how to apply this funding formula in light of the experiences of some developed countries, and in accordance with the cultural context of Egyptian society. The current research uses the descriptive approach to achieve its objectives. The research also follows the following procedural steps:
• Step 1: defining the general framework of the research through shedding light on its problem, objective, importance, methodology, and limitations, as well as its main terms.
• Step 2: describing and defining theoretical foundations of the formula of performance-based funding in university education.
• Step 3: reviewing the experiences of some developed countries (USA and Australia) in applying performance-based funding formula for university education (analytical descriptive vision).
• Step 4: monitoring the reality of Egyptian university education funding, and identifying the reasons for applying performance-based funding formula (brief descriptive vision).
• Step 5: putting forward a proposed vision that will develop the Egyptian university education funding system in light of performance-based funding formula based on analysis of research literature; analysis of leading experiences in this field; diagnosis of the Egyptian reality (its circumstances, and its potential), and opinions of experts in the field of specialization

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1. Afriyie, A. O. (2015): Financial sustainability factors of Higher Education Institutions: A Predictive Model, International Journal of Education Learning and Development, Vol. 2, No. 3, April, pp. 17-38.
2. Ahmad. A.; Soon, N. K. & Yee, K. S. (2015): Performance Based Funding Mechanisms: The Applicability Study in the Context of Malaysian Public Universities, 4th International Conference on Technology Management, Business and Entrepreneurship (ICTMBE) "Sustaining entrepreneurial Ecosystem through technology Innovation", 24-25 November, Kings Green Hotel Melaka, Malaysia, pp. 628-640.
3. …………. ; Saripuden, Sh. & Soon, N.K. (2015): Analysis of the Higher Education Funding Systems, Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, Vol. 2015, July, Article ID 873723, pp. 1-12.
Available at: http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/JELHE/jelhe.html (Accessed date; 2 March 2020).
4. Alexander, F. K. (2000): The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol.71, No. 4, Jul. - Aug., pp. 411-431.
5. Altbach, P. G. (2004): The Costs and Benefits of World-Class Universities, Academe, American Association of University Professors AAUP, (January-February). Available at:
http://bcct.unam.mx/adriana/bibliografia%20parte%202/ALTBACH,%20P..pdf (Accessed date; 2 Dec. 2020).
6.  ……………..& Salmi, J. (eds.) (2011). The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Available at:
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2357/646680PUB0acad00Box361543B00PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed date; 30 March 2020).
7. Australian Government, Department of Education, Skills & Employment (2020A): Higher education providers’ 2018 mission based compacts. Available at:https://docs.education.gov.au/collections/higher-education-providers-2018-mission-based-compacts (Accessed date; 2 July 2020).
8.…………………………………………………………………………… (2020 AA): Higher education providers’ 2018 - 2020 Commonwealth Grant Scheme funding agreements. Available at: https://docs.education.gov.au/collections/higher-education-providers-2018-2020-commonwealth-grant-scheme-funding-agreements (Accessed date; 3 July 2020).
9. .………………………………………………………………………… (2020 B): Universities’ 2014-16 Mission-based Compacts. Available at: http://docs.education.gov.au/node/34873 (Accessed date; 4 July 2020).
10. .………………………………………………………………………… (2020 C): 2014-16 Mission-based Compact Between: The Commonwealth of Australia and The Flinders University of South Australia. Available at: https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/jcu_2014-16_compact_final.pdf (Accessed date; 10 July 2020).
11.…………………………………………………………………………… (2020 D): 2014-16 Mission-based Compact Between: The Commonwealth of Australia and James Cook University. Available at:
https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/flinders_2014-16_compact_final.pdf (Accessed date; 5 July 2020).
12. Australian Government, Department of Education & Training (2020A): 2018 Mission Based Compact between the Commonwealth of Australia and James Cook University, Available at:https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/2018_-_compact_-_james_cook_university.pdf (Accessed date; 10 July 2020).
13. ……………………………………………………………… (2020B): 2018 Mission Based Compact between the Commonwealth of Australia and James Cook University, 3P. Available at:
https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/2018_-_compact_-_flinders_university.pdf (Accessed date; 10 July 2020).
14. Badawy, M.; Abd El-Aziz, A.A. & Hefny, H. (2018): Exploring and Measuring the Key Performance Indicators in Higher Education Institutions, International Journal of Intelligent Computing & Information Science ( IJICIS), Vol.18, No. 1, January, pp. 37-47.
   15. Bell, E.; Fryar, A. H. & Hillman, N. W. (2018): When intuition misfires: A meta-analysis of research on performance-based funding in higher education, In. Hazelkorn, E.; Coates, H. & McCormick, A. C.  (Eds.): Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education, (pp. 108–124), Edward Elgar Pub., London, UK.
16. Benneworth, P. et al. (2011): Quality-related funding, performance agreements and profiling in higher education: An international comparative study, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), Feb., Enschede, Netherlands.
17. ……………, Pinheiro, R.  &Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2016): One size does not fit all! New perspectives on the university in the social knowledge economy, Science & Public Policy (SPP), Vol.  43, issue 6, December, pp. 731-735.
18. Birdsall, Ch. (2019): Policy Adoption, Innovation, and Performance Management: The Case of Performance-funding Policies in State Postsecondary Education, State and Local Government Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 34-45.
19. Boelscher, S. & Snyder, M. (2019): Driving better outcomes: Fiscal year 2019 state status & typology update, HCM Strategists, Available at: http://hcmstrategists.com/promising-policy/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/DRIVING-BETTER-Outcomes-Fiscal-Year-2019-State-Status-Typology-Update_Final_Final.pdf (Accessed date; 15 March 2020)
20. Boland, W. C. (2020): Performance Funding and Historically Black Colleges and Universities: An Assessment of Financial Incentives and Baccalaureate Degree Production, Educational Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 4, June, pp. pp. 644–673.
21. Bradley, D. et al. (1988): Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report, Dec., Ausralian Government, Commonwealth of Australia.
22. Britannica, 2020; Unitary state Government. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/unitary-state (Accessed date; 15 Oct. 2020).
23. Cave, M., Hanney, S., & Kogan, M. (1991): The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice (Higher Education Policy Series 3), 2 edition, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Ltd, London, England.
24. Claeys-Kulik, A.-L., & Estermann, T. (2015): Define Thematic Report: Performance-Based Funding of Universities in Europe, European University Association (EUA), Brussels, Belgium.
25. Community College Research Center (CCRC) (February 2014): CCRC policy brief: Performance Funding: Impacts, Obstacles, and Unintended Outcomes, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
26. Complete College America (2013): The Game Changers: Are states implementing the best reforms to get more college graduates? Report, October, Washington D.C.
27. Conner, T. W. & Rabovsky, Th. M. (2011): Accountability, affordability, access: A review of the recent trends in higher education policy research, The Policy Studies Journal (PSJ), Vol. 39, Issue s1, Special Issue: Public Policy Yearbook 2011, April,  93-112.
28. Council of the European Union (2011): Council conclusions on the modernisation of higher education, of the 3128th Education, Youth, Culture and Sport Council meeting, 28-29 November, Brussels.  Available at:
http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/126375.pdf (Accessed date; 21 Juin 2020)
29. Curtin, K. M. (2018): Performance funding in higher education, Ph.D. Dissertation, April, Faculty of D’Youville College, Buffalo, NY.
30. Dawkins, J. (1988): Higher Education: A Policy Statement, TD/TNC 87.2305, July, Australian Government Publishing Service, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Available at: http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A9695 (Accessed date; 20 March 2020).
31. Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010): Resource dependence theory: Past and future, In. Dobbin, F.; Schoonhoven, C. B. & Lounsbury, M. (Eds.):  Stanford's organization theory renaissance, 1970–2000, (Series: Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 28), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, (Chapter 2; pp. 21-42).
32. De Boer, et al. (2015): Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen Higher education systems, Report for the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, March, CHEPS, Universiteit Twente, NL.
33. Dougherty, K. J. & Natow, R. S. (2020): Performance-based funding for higher education: how well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? Higher Education, Vol.  80, Issue 3, Sep., pp. 457–478.
34. .…………………………………… (2015): The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education: Origins, Discontinuations, and Transformations, Johns Hopkins University Pres, Baltimore, M.
35. …………………. et al.  (2016a): Looking inside the black box of performance funding for higher education: Policy instruments, organizational obstacles, and intended and unintended impacts, The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences RSF, Vol.   2, No. 1, April, pp. 147-173.
36.…………   et al. (2016b): Performance Funding of Higher education, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Google Books
37……………et al. (2014a): Performance Funding for Higher Education: Forms, Origins, Impacts, and Futures, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (AAPSS): 655, Sep., pp. 163-184.
38. ……………et al (2014b): The political origins of performance funding 2.0 in Indiana, Ohio, and Tennessee: Theoretical perspectives and comparisons with performance funding 1.0., CCRC Working Paper No. 68, Community College Research Center, New York, NY.
39. ……………& Reddy, V. (2011): The impacts of state performance funding systems on higher education institutions:  Research literature review and policy recommendations, Community College Research Center Working CCRC, Working Paper No. 37, December, Teachers College, Columbia Universit, 64P.
40. Drehmann, M.  & Nikolaou, K. (2009): Funding Liquidity Risk: Definition and Measurement, Working paper series,  No. 1024, March, European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
41. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Agency theory: An assessment and review, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. pp. 57-74.
42. Ellis, R. A. (2015): Performance-based funding: Equity analysis of funding distribution among state universities, Journal of Educational Issues, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.1-19.
43. Encyclopaedia Britannica (2020); Finance Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/finance, (Accessed date; 21 Mai 2020).
44. Estermann, Th. & Claeys-Kulik, A.-L. (2016): Performance-Based Funding of Universities in Europe,  International Higher Education, No. 85, Spring, pp. 31- 33.  
45. ………….. ; Pruvot, E. B. & Claeys-Kulik, A.-L. C. (2013): Designing strategies for efficient funding of higher education in Europe: Define interim report, European University Association (With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union), Brussels, Belgium.
46. Fahim, Y.  & Sami, N. (2010): Access to and Equity in Financing Higher Education in Egypt, In., Galal, A.  & Kanaan, T.: Financing Higher Education in Arab Countries, Policy Research Report, No. 34, July, the Economic Research Forum (ERF), pp. 11-28.
47. Favero, N. & Rutherford, A. (2020): Will the Tide Lift All Boats? Examining the Equity Effects of Performance Funding Policies in U.S. Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 61, Issue 1, March, pp. 1-25.
48. Fowles, J. (2014): Funding and focus: Resource dependence in public higher education, Research in Higher Education, Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 272-287.
49. Frey, B. S.; Homberg, F. & Osterloh, M. (2013): Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service, Organization Studies, Vol. 34, No. 7, July, pp. 949-972.
50. Friedel, J. N. & Thornton, Z. M. (2014):  Performance-Based Funding: The National Landscape, Presented at Iowa Board of Regents Performance-Based Funding Task Force, January 21, College of Human Science, Iowa State University.
51. Frølich, N., Schmidt, E. K., & Rosa, M. J. (2010): Funding systems for higher education and their impacts on institutional strategies and academia: A comparative perspective, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 7-21.
52. Ga´ ndara, D. & Rutherford, A. (2018): Mitigating Unintended Impacts? The Effects of Premiums for Underserved Populations in Performance-Funding Policies for Higher Education, Res. High. Educ., Vol. 59, pp. 681–703.
53. Hagood, L.P. (2019): The Financial Benefits and Burdens of Performance Funding in Higher Education, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 41, Issue 2, June, pp. 189-213.
54. Harnisch, T. L. (2011): Performance-based funding: A re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing, American Association of State Colleges and Universities, A Higher Education Policy Brief , June Washington, D.C.
55. Harvey, A. ; Cakitaki, B. & Brett, M. (2018): Principles for equity in higher education performance funding, Report for the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education Research, Nov., Centre for Higher Education Equity and Diversity Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, pp. 1-59.
56. Hendrickson, R. M. etal. (2013): Academic leadership and governance of higher education: A guide for trustees, leaders, and aspiring leaders of two-and four-year institutions, Stylus Publishing, LLC, Sterling, Virginia.
57. Herbst, M. (2007): Financing public universities: The Case of Performance Funding, Springer, Netherlands.
58. Hearn, J. C. (2015). Outcomes-based funding in historical and comparative context, Lumina issue papers, November, Lumina Foundation.
59. Hillman, N.W.; Fryar, A.H. & Crespı´n-Trujillo, V. (2018): Evaluating the Impact of Performance Funding in Ohio and Tennessee, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, Feb.,  pp. 144–170.
60. ………….., Tandberg, D. A., & Fryar, A. H. (2015): Evaluating the impacts of “new”performance funding in higher education, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol.  37, Issue 4, Dec., pp.  501-519.
61. Hoffman, L.A. (March 2020): Performance Based Funding and the Florida State University System: An Exploratory Analysis, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, College of Education, University of South Florida, USA.
62. Hu, X. (2019): Efficiency for Whom? Varying Impact of Performance-Based Funding on Community Colleges in Louisiana, Community College Review, Vol. 47, Issue 4, Oct., pp. 323-359.
63. Johnes, J. & Taylor, J. (1990): Performance indicators in higher education: UK universities, Open University Press and the Society for Research into Higher Education, Milton Keynes.
64. Jongbloed, B. (2020):Funding Higher Education: A View across Europe, European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities (ESMU), Brussels, Belgium.
65. ………….... & De Boer, H. (Sep. 2020):  Performance Agreements in Denmark, Ontario and the Netherlands, Report for the project Evaluation of development contracts in Norwegian higher education, CHEPS,  University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
66. …………….et al. (July 2018):Performance Agreements in Higher Education: A New Approach to Higher Education Funding, (pp. 671-687), In Adria Curaj, A.; Deca, L. & Pricopie, R. (eds.,): European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies, Springer International Publishing AG., Switzerland.
67. Jonkers, K. & Zacharewicz, Th. (2016): Performance based funding: a comparative assessment, Joint Research Center, JRC Science for policy Report, European Commission (Eur 27837 EN), European Commission.
68. .………………………………… (2015): Performance based funding: a comparative assessment of their use and nature in EU Member States, (A working Paper; Eur 27477 EN), Joint Research Center, JRC Science for policy Report, European Commission.
69. Kelchen, R. (2018): Do performance-based funding policies affect underrepresented student enrollment?, The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 89, Issue 5, Mar.,  pp. 702-727.
70. ……………. & Stedrak, L. J. (2016): Does performance-based funding affect colleges' financial priorities? , Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 41, No. 3, Win., pp. 302-321.
71. Kelly, A. P. (June 2015): College Innovation and Quality Assurance, In Frederick M. Hess, F. M & Max Eden, M. (eds.,): An Education Agenda for 2016: Conservative Solutions for Expanding Opportunity, (pp. 71-80), American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Available at: https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/An-Education-Agenda-for-2016-final-text-and-cover.pdf, (Accessed date; 15 Jan. 2020).
72. Kivistö, J. (2008): An assessment of agency theory as a framework for the government–university relationship, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 30, No. 4, Nov.,  pp. 339-350.
73. ………….  (2005): The government‐higher education institution relationship: Theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory, Tertiary Education & Management, Vol. 11, No.1, pp. 1-17.
74. Kosanovich, M. L. (2019): Impacts of outcomes based funding on resource allocation: a Case study of senior administrators in Colorado, Ph.D. Dissertation, Dec., The Graduate School of Clemson University.
75. Levačić, R. (2008): Funding Schools by Formula, In. Soguel, N. C. & Jaccard, P.: Governance and performance of education systems, (pp. 205-245), Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
76. Li, A.Y. (2020): Performance Funding Policy Impacts on STEM Degree Attainment, Educational Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 2, March, pp. 312-349.
77. ……….. (2019): The Weight of the Metric: Performance Funding and the Retention of Historically Underserved Students, The Journal of Higher Education, (Published online: 29 Apr. 2019), pp. 1-27.
78. ………… (2018): lessons learned: A Case Study of Performance Funding in Higher Education,Technical Report, ACADE Mix, Third Way, Oct., pp. 1-21.
79.………… & Kennedy, A. I. (2018): Performance Funding Policy Effects on Community College Outcomes: Are Short-Term Certificates on the Rise? Community College Review, Vol. 46, No.1, pp. 3-39.
80. Li, F. (2020): Book Review: Ellen Hazelkorn, Hamish Coates, and Alexander C. McCormick (eds.): Research handbook on quality, performance and accountability in higher education, Higher Education, Vol.  79, Issue 5, May, pp. 939-940. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00442-z (Published: 23 August 2019).
81. Lloyd, R. (2004). Quality health care: A guide to developing and using indicators, Jones and Bartlett Learning Publishers, Massachusetts, Sudbury.
82. Louisiana Board of Regents (2015): Report and Recommendations of the GRAD Act Review Panel (As Required by Act 741 of 2010), November, pp. 1-8. Available at:
at:https://regents.louisiana.gov/assets/LegislativeResponse/GRADActReviewPanelReportFINAL111215.pdf (Accessed date; 30 Mai 2020).
83. Mace, J. (1993): University Funding Changes and University Efficiency, Higher Education Review, Vol. 25.  No. 2, Sept., pp. 7-22.
84. Macintyre, S.; Brett, A., & Croucher, G. (2017): No End of a Lesson: Australia's Unified National System of higher education, Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Australia.
85. Massy, W. F. (2016): Reengineering the University: How to Be Mission Centered, Market Smart, and Margin Conscious, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
86. McKeown-Moak, M. P. (2013): The “new” performance funding in higher education, Educational Considerations, Vol. 40, No. 2, Article3, Spring, pp. 3-12. Available at:
https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=edconsiderations (Accessed date; 30 March 2020).
87. …………& Mullin, Ch. M. (2014): Higher Education Finance research: Policy, Politics, and Practice (A Volume in Conducting Research in Education Finance: Methods, Measurement, and Policy Perspectives), IAP- Information Age Publishing Inc., USA.
88. McKinney, L., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2017): Performance-based funding for community colleges in Texas: Are colleges disadvantaged by serving the most disadvantaged students?  The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 88, Issue 2, pp. 159-182.
89. Miao, K. (2012): Performance-based funding of higher education: A detailed look at best practices in 6 states, Center for American Progress, August 7, pp. 1-12. Available at:
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/educationpostsecondary/reports/2012/08/07/12036/performance-based-funding-of-higher-education/ (Accessed date; 1 March 2020).
90. Miller, T. (2016): Higher education outcomes-based funding models and academic quality, Lumina issue papers, March. Lumina Foundation. Available at: https://www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/ensuring-quality-1.pdf (Accessed date; 12 Juin 2020).
91. Mok, K.-H. (2003): Globalisation and higher education restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 117-129.
92. NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) (2020): Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates, The Condition of Education, (Last Updated: April 2020). Available at:The Condition of Education - Postsecondary Education - Programs, Courses, and Completions - Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates - Indicator April (2020) (Accessed date; 12 Juin 2020).
93. National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) (2013): Performance-based funding for higher education. Available at: https://www.ncsl.org/research/fiscal-policy/performance-based-funding-for-higher-education.aspx (Accessed date; 12 Juin 2020).
94. Neary, Ch. (2019): U.S. Higher education performance-based funding policy diffusion and its association with state political ideologies and state budgeting taxonomies, Ph.D. Dissertation, Iowa State University Ames, Iowa, USA.
95. Nelson, B. (2003): Our Universities: Backing Australia's Future, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
Available at:http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A38781 (Accessed date; 15 Sep.2020).
96. Norton, A.  (2016): Mapping Australian higher education 2016, Grattan Institute Support, Grattan Institute Report No. 2018-11.
Available at: https://grattan.edu.au/report/mapping-australian-higher-education-2016/ (Accessed date; 15 Aug.2020).
97. ………….. & Cherastidtham, I. (Sep.2018): Mapping Australian higher education 2018, Grattan Institute Support, Grattan Institute Report, Grattan Institute Report No. 2016-11, August. Available at: https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/907-Mapping-Australian-higher-education-2018.pdf   (Accessed date; 15 Aug.2020).
98. Office of Parliamentary Counsel (2018): Higher Education Support Act 2003, No. 149, Compilation No. 67, (Compilation date; 1/7/2018, Registered; 2/8/18), Canberra.
99. Okerblom, M. J. (Aug. 2019): The impact of performance funding on community college degree completion, certificate completion, and transfer rate: a difference- in-differences approach, Ph.D. Dissertation, Community College Leadership, Old Dominion University, USA.
100. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978): The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Harper & Row, New York.
101. …………………………  (2003): The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
102. Pruvot, E. B.; Claeys-Kulik, A.-L. C. & Estermann, Th. (2015): Designing strategies for efficient funding of higher education in Europe: Define interim report, European University Association (EUA), (With the support of the Lifelong Learning programme of the European Union), Brussels, Belgium.
103. Probert, B. (2015): The quality of Australia's higher education system: How it might be defined, improved and assured, Discussion Paper 4, Office for Learning and Teaching Discussion Paper Series, Australian Government. Available at:  http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A69864 (Accessed date; 15 Oct.2020).
104. Salmi, J. & Hauptman, A.M. (2011): Resource allocation mechanisms in tertirary education: A typology and an assessment, pp. 60-83. Available at:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eeab/3641120260b664a1dfd2faa9bce4d4551487.pdf?_ga=2.8259569.2104525693.1595016947-478941328.1594772887 (Accessed date; 5 Feb. 2020).
105……………………………. (2006): Innovations in Tertiary Education Financing: A Comparative Evaluation of Allocation Mechanisms,  Working Paper series (education), No. 4, The World Bank, September, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
106. Santiago, P. et al. (2008): Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society, Volume 1, Special Features: Governance, Funding, Quality, OECD Publishing, France. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/41266690.pdf
(Accessed date; 25 Oct.2020).
107. Santos, J. L. (2007): Resource allocation in public research universities, The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 2, Dec.,  pp. 125-144.
108. Schwab, K. (ed.) (2019): The Global Competitiveness Report 2019, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
109. Shea, S. O. (2018): An Examination of the Implementation of Ireland’s New Higher Education System Performance Framework in a Sample of Higher Education Institutions, Ph.D. Dissertation, September, Dublin City University Institute of Education.
110. Soulsby, L.R.I. (May 2020): Policymakers’ Decision-Making: A critical Plicy Analysis on Performance Based Funding, Ph.D. Dissertation, Old, Dominion University, USA.
111. Spath, P. L. (2018): Introduction to healthcare quality management, 3ed., Health Administration Press (HAP), Chicago, Illinois; Association of University Programs in Health Administration (AUPHA), Washington, DC.
112. Sullivan, T. A. et al. (2013): Improving measurement of productivity in higher education, The National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.
113. Tandberg, D. A. & Hillman, N. W. (2014): State higher education performance funding: Data, outcomes, and policy implications, Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, January, pp. 222-243.
114. Texas State Technical College (TSTC) (2020): TSTC funding formula. Available at:  http://www.tstc.edu/about/funding (Accessed date; 1 March 2020).
115. The Pew Charitable Trusts (2015): Federal and state funding of higher education: A changing landscape, June, Philadelphia, Penn.
116. Umbricht M. R., Fernandez F., Ortagus J. C. (2017): An examination of the (un) intended consequences of performance funding in higher education, Educational Policy, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 643-673.
117. UNDP United Nations Development Programme (2020): Human Development Report 2020: The next frontier; Human development and the Anthropocene, New York, USA.
118. Williams, R.  & Leahy, A. (March 2019): Ranking of National Higher Education Systems 2019, A project sponsored by Univeristas 21, the Melbourne Institute,  University of  Melbourne, Australia,  pp. 1-50.
119. World Bank (2010): Executive Summary: Higher Education in Egypt, OECD and IBRD, pp.13-42, Available at: www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/44820471.pdf (Accessed date; 15 Aug. 2020).
120. …………….. (2002) Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education, Washington D.C.
121. World University Rankings 2019-20. Available at: https://cwur.org/2019-20.php (Accessed date; 15 Sep. 2020).
122. Zumeta, W. & Li, A. (2016): Assessing the underpinnings of performance funding 2.0: Will this dog hunt? Trends and Issues November, TIAA Institute, New York.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics