Factors Concerning Reluctance the Members Teaching Staff at Faculty of Education of Al-Imam Mohammed Bin Saud Islamic University to Use Peer Evaluation for Teaching Performance – A filed Study

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Abstract

Abstract
The present study aimed to reveal the subjective, cultural and vocational factors concerning reluctance to use peer evaluation for teaching performance. It also aimed to propose solutions that may contribute to reduce these factors, and identify the statistically significant differences between the individuals of the sample and variables (sex , scientific department and the academic Rate)frommembers teaching staff point of view of at faculty of Education of Al-Imam MohammedBin Saud Islamic university . 
  The study was based on the descriptive (survey) method and take a questionnaire as a tool to collect data .
  The study reached the following results: 
-The order of the related factors was as follow: culture factors were ranked first, followed by the vocational factors and subjective factors. 
- There weren't statistically significant differences among the study dimensions due to the variables in tool as whole.
- The study recommended the encouragement members staff to use peer evaluation for developing teaching performance.

Keywords

References

- Flinders University (2012), preparing for peer evaluation: a guide for staff whose teaching is being evaluated, Retrieved: 29/1/2019 from:https://www.flimders.edu.au/teachingquality/evaluation/peer-review
learned. Academic Medicine. Vol. 84. No.8/1104 – 1110, Retrieved:7/12/2018 from:
https://www.//hms.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/assets/sites/Academy/files/lorisarticlepdf
- Perlman, Baron & Macann, Lee (1998). Peer review of teaching, university of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Retrieved: 7/12/2018 from: https://www.uwosh.edu/faculity-staff/perlman/peerreview.pdf
- University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (2016), Faculty Evaluation Handbook. Retrieved: 29/11/2019 from: https://www.uapb.edu/sits/faculty20%evaluation20%handbook
- University of Tennessee (n.d). Peer evaluation of Teaching Guide, Retrieved: 29/1/2019 from: https://tenntlc.utk.edu/publication.html
 
- Alsammer, Ahmed Abdul Sattar (2013). Peer Review as a Scheme of
 
- Department of Extension (n.d). peer evaluation of teaching for facility, the Ohio state university, Retrieved: 29/1/2019 from: https://extension.ous.edu/police-and-procedures Evaluating Facility Performance: A critical perspective. Journal of the college of Arts. University of Basrah. (65) P. 43 - 72
- Bandy, Joe (n.d). Peer review of teaching. Retrieved: 7/12/2018 from: https://cft/vamderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/
- Center for Teaching and Learning (2014). Peer Review of Teaching White Paper, Retrieved: 29/1/2019 from:
https://www.faculity.movate.utexas.edu/sites/defult/files/peerrivewiofteachingwhitepaper-72414.pdf-handbook/vi-promotion-and-tenure/peer/evaluation-teaching-faclity
- Divall, Margarita & et.al, (2012). Follow – up Assessment of a Program facility Peer Observation and Evaluation. American Journal of pharmaceutical Education 76 (4), Retrieved: 7/12/2018 from: https://www.ncbi.n/m.nih.gov/panc/articles/pmc3355281
- Farrell, Kelly (2011). Collegial Feedback on Teaching: A Guide to Peer Review, the University of Melbourne, Retrieved:7/12/2018 from: https://www.melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/data/assets/pdf
- Newman, Lori & et.al, (2009). Developing a peer Assessment of lecturing instrument: lessons

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics