The degree of practice of the female gifted students' teachers for the skills of systemic thinking in teaching from the students’ point of view

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Abstract


The study aimed at determining the degree of practice of the gifted students' teachers for the skills of systemic thinking in teaching, and whether there are differences in the degree of their practice due to the variables of the sample members (specialization, grade). The descriptive method was used. And its stability. The study sample consisted of (80) students from gifted students in Al-Baha area
 The results of the study showed that the skill of the calendar came in the first ranking between the skills of systemic thinking followed by the skill of analysis, and then the skill of understanding relationships, and the skill of installation in the last order, and that the assessment of all skills came at a very high estimate. The results of the study showed that there were no statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) in the degree of teachers' practice of systemic thinking skills due to the variables of gifted students (specialization and grade

Keywords

References

Andre, L. (2009). Providing students with a head start through mentorship and systems thinking within a vertical design studio environment. International Journal of Product Development, 9, 357 – 360.
Brett, R. & Patricia, H. (2004). Leadership Development at Toronto Rehab: Aligning Thinking With Behavior. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 27 (1), 36 – 42.
Bruce, L. Robert, L. (2000). Reflections on leadership and learning: Revisiting The Fifth Discipline. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21 (3), 162 – 164.
Charles, B. ; Paul, K. & David, D. (2001). A framework for systemic analysis of complex issues. The Journal of Management Development, 20 (9/ 10), 772 – 785.
Christopher, S.(2003). Improving Academic Achievement In Primary Students Through A Systematic Approach To Guidance And Counseling. The WashingtonSchoolResearchCenter, 14(1), 1-24.
Douglas, L.(2011). Adapting Postsecondary Teaching To The Needs of A New Generation. Journal of College Quarterly, 14(3). 234-255.
Harlene, A. & Lynn, H. (2007). Memories of Tom David Andersen: Friend, Colleague, Scholar, Inspirer, and Rhizome. Family Process, 46 (4), 571 – 775.
John, B, & Tim, H. (2007). Analysis, synthesis, systems thinking and the scientific method: rediscovering the importance of open systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 24 (2), 143 – 160.
Klaus, D. (2004). Models, Systemic Thinking, and Unpredictability in Consulting. Performance Improvement, 43 (6) 17 – 20.
 
 
Michael, W. (2006). Conceptual similarities: Responsibility, self, and systemic thinking in the family systems theory of Murray Bowen and the theology of H. Richard Niebuhrby Gillen. Ph.D., Union Theological Seminary & PresbyterianSchool of Christian Education, AAT 3228922
Misha, H. (2007). Light bulbs and change: systems thinking and organisational learning for new ventures. The Learning Organization, 14 (6), 499 – 511.
Robert, H. & Laura, M. (2003). Apply “total systems thinking” to tackle competitive challenges. CIM Bulletin, 96 (1067), 8 – 10.
Thomas, E. (2005). Systemic Model of the Youth Mentoring Intervention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26 (2), 169 – 175.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics