The relative contribution of thinking styles in predicting the extent of awareness of sustainable development among students of the faculty of education in Suez

Document Type : Original Article

Author

educational psychology- Faculty of education -Suez university

Abstract

The research aimed at clarifying the relationship between Sternberg’s thinking styles and sustainable development and its parameters. Methods: the study was carried out on a sample of (438) male and female students from the Faculty of Education - Suez University, with an average age of 19.9 ±1.73.  Every student was subjected to, the scale of students’ awareness of the sustainable development parameters (Prepared by: the researcher), and Sternberg's list of thinking styles (Arabization and validation: Al-Dardir and Al-Tayeb, 2004). ANOVA, correlation coefficients and regression analysis, were used for statistical analysis. Results: The study revealed no statistically significant differences for gender or the joint interaction between gender and educational level (first and fourth) on the awareness of sustainable development and its parameters. There were statistically significant differences between the academic divisions regarding the awareness of sustainable development and its parameters. The prevailing thinking styles of were in the order of (hierarchical - external - legislative). No statistically significant effect regarding (gender - educational level) or the interactions between them, was found on the thinking styles except for the executive and external thinking styles that were in favor of males, while (local - royal - internal) styles were in favor of the fourth group’s males. The study revealed significant positive correlation between awareness of sustainable development and its parameters with thinking styles namely, (liberal, legislative, judgmental, hierarchical, minority). This relation was confirmed with regression analysis so, sustainable development can be predicted through the following thinking styles (liberal, global, minority, hierarchical).

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
Akçay, Ş. Ö. (2019). Examining the relationship between the thinking styles and some demographical variables of the students receiving professional music education. Kastamonu Education Journal27(2) , 683 -700 .
Alipour, A., Akhondy, N., & Aerab-sheybani, K. (2012). Relationship between handedness and thinking styles in female and male students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences32, 22-28.‏
Anderberg, E., Nordén, B., & Hansson, B. (2009). Global learning for sustainable development in higher education: recent trends and a critique. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(4):368-378 .
Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of sustainability in higher education.‏416- 430.
Batanović, V., Guberinić, S., & Petrović, R. (2011). System theoretic approach to sustainable development problems. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 21(1), 1-10.
 
 
Bezeljak, P., Scheuch, M., & Torkar, G. (2020). Understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development among pre-service biology teachers. Sustainability12(17), 6892, 1-16.
   
 
Burmeister, M. & Eilks, I. (2013). An understanding of sustainability and education for sustainable development among German student teachers and trainee teachers of chemistry. Science Education International, 24(2), 167-194, University of Bermen, Germany.
Chabowski, B. R., Mena, J. A., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: a basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science39(1), 55-70.‏
Cohen., (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. London , Academic Press,Inc.
Dawe, G., Jucker, R., & Martin, S. (2005). Sustainable development in higher education: current practice and future developments. A report to the Higher Education Academy, York (UK).
Fien, J., & Maclean, R. (2000). Teacher education for sustainability Teacher Education Projects from Asia and the Pacific. In Education for a sustainable future (pp. 91-111). Springer, Boston, MA.‏
 Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional children63(3), 295-312.‏
Hopkins , c.(2008) . choose the future ,education for sustainable development,              CONFERENCE REPORT, Nov.26-28,Winnipege,Canada.                        
Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2011). Sustainability and consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science39(1), 40-54.‏
Inweregbu, J. (2006). An investigation of thinking styles and learning approaches of university students in Nigeria. Wayne State University.‏
Jahanshahi, A., Brem, A., & Shahabinezhad, M. (2018). Does thinking style make a difference in environmental perception and orientation? Evidence from entrepreneurs in post-sanction Iran. Sustainability10(5), 15461-19.
Leal Filho, W. (Ed.). (2009). Sustainability at universities: opportunities, challenges and trends. Lang.‏
Lee, Y., Youn, N., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2011). The content of a brand scandal moderating the effect of thinking style on the scandal’s spillover. ACR North American Advances.‏
Lee, Y., Youn, N., & Nayakankuppam, D. (2015). Sustainable behavior and holistic thinking. In Communicating sustainability for the green economy, Routledge, ‏98-113.
Lopes, R. P., Mesquita, C., del Río, M. D. L. C., & Álvarez-García, J. (2018). Developing Sustainability Awareness in Higher Education. In Strategies and Best Practices in Social Innovation (pp. 131-152). Springer, Cham.
Lubbe, S.; Singh, S.(2009). An investigation of the thinking styles of agriculturalists and their use of information technology. In EFITA conference ’09, Proceedings of the 7th EFITA Conference, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 6–8 July , Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 477–485.
McKeown, R., Hopkins, C. A., Rizi, R., & Chrystalbridge, M. (2002). Education  for sustainable development toolkit (p. 2002). Knoxville: Energy, Environment and Resources Center, University of Tennessee.
Moldan, B., & Dahl, A. L. (2007). Challenges to sustainability indicators. Sustainability Indicators: a scientific assessment. SCOPE67, 1-24.‏
Network, C. C. (2005). Consumer Citizenship Education–Guidelines. Higher Education.
Norton, B. G. (2007). Ethics and sustainable development: an adaptive approach to environmental choice. Handbook of sustainable development, 27-44. 
 Özsoy, V. (2016). Arts and Design Education for Sustainable Development, Global Journal on Humanites & Social Sciences. (3) , pp 487-497.
Raffaldi, S., Iannello, P., Vittani, L., & Antonietti, A. (2012). Decision-making styles in the workplace: Relationships between self-report questionnaires and a contextualized measure of the analytical-systematic versus global-intuitive approach. Sage Open2(2),1-11.
Scott, W., & Gough, S. (2006). Universities and sustainable development in a liberal democracy: A reflection on the necessity for barriers to change. In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelsson (Eds.), Drivers and barriers for implementing sustainable development in higher education. (Education for Sustainable Development in Action Technical Paper 3, pp. 89–96). Paris, France: UNESCO.
Seyfang, G. (2009). The new economics of sustainable consumption. Minería transnacional, narrativas del desarrollo y resistencias socials, Buenos Aires: Biblos.‏
Sherren, K. (2006). "Core issues: Reflections on sustainability in Australian University coursework programs". International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 7 (4) , 400-413.
Sibbel,A. (2009)."Pathways towards sustainability through higher education". International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10 (1),  68-82.
Sternberg, R. (1997) . Styles of  thinking  and  learning . Canadian Journal of   school psychology, 13(2),15 - 40 .
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style?. American psychologist52(7), 700-712.
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). MSG thinking styles inventory: Manual. Star Mountain Projects.‏
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Zhang, L. F. (2008). Styles of learning and thinking matter in instruction and assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(6), 486-506.‏
Thomas, I. (2009). Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. Journal of Transformative Education7(3), 245-264.
Tilbury, D. (2004). Environmental education for sustainability: A force for change in higher education. In Higher education and the challenge of sustainability (pp. 97-112). Springer, Dordrecht.
Tuder, Robyn (2008), “The Pedagogy of Creativity: Understanding higher order capability development in design and arts education”. Proceedings of the 4th International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education, Vol. 4. Higher education,arts and creativity. Barcelona.
Türkoğlu, B. (2019). Opinions of preschool teachers and pre-service teachers on environmental education and environmental awareness for sustainable development in the preschool period. Sustainability11(18), 4925.‏1-35.
UNESCO (2012) .Education for Sustainable Development, Education for Sustainable Development in Action : Learning and Training Tools .Source Book, UNESCO Education Sector.
UNESCO Education Sector (2017) . Division for Inclusion, Peace and Sustainable Development, Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives.Paris, France.
Wals, A. E. (2010). Mirroring, Gestaltswitching and transformative social learning: Stepping stones for developing sustainability competence. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.‏11(4),380-390.
Wals, A. E. J., & Corcoran, P. B. (2006). Sustainability as an outcome of transformative learning. In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelsson (Eds.), Drivers and barriers for implementing sustainable development in higher education (Education for Sustainable Development in Action, Technical Paper 3, pp. 103–108). Paris, France: UNESCO.
Warren, A. E., Archambault, L. M., & Foley, R. W. (2014). Sustainability education framework for teachers: developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking. Journal of Sustainability Education, 6, 1–14.
Zhang , L. (2001). Do Thinking styles contribute to Academic Achievement beyond Self-rated Abilities?. The Journal of  Psychology, 135( 6), 621-637.
Zhang L. (2002). Thinking Styles: their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance , Educational Psychology, 22( 3), 331-348.
Zhang, L. F., & He, Y. (2003). Do thinking styles matter in the use of and attitudes toward computing and information technology among Hong Kong university students?. Journal of Educational Computing Research29(4), 471-493.‏
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teachers' characteristics. international Journal of Psychology37(1), 3-12.‏
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational psychology review17(1), 1-53.‏
Zhu, C., & Zhang, L. F. (2011). Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students. Educational Psychology31(3), 361-375.‏