The Effectiveness of Productive Failure In Digital Investigation Environment On Developing Deep Understanding and Achievement in Organic Chemistry and Goal Orientation Among Female Secondary School Students In Saudi Arabia.

Document Type : Original Article

Author

department of Curriculum and methods of teaching and Education Technology- Faculty of education- Benha University

Abstract

The current study aimed to measure the effect of productive failure in the digital investigation environment on developing deep understanding and achievement in organic chemistry and its relations with goal orientation among secondary female students in Saudi Arabia. The study used the experimental design with the control and experimental groups, both pre and post measurement, The study groups included (22) students in the experimental group and (24) students in the control group at the secondary stage in Wadi Al-Dawasir governorate in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Study used three tools: a deep understanding test in organic chemistry, an achievement test in organic chemistry, and a goal orientation scale (Translated by: Banna, 2018. The results indicates that there are statistically significant differences at the level (α = 0.05) between the mean scores of the experimental group and the control group in the deep understanding test, and the achievement test in organic chemistry for the third-year secondary students in favor of the experimental group, and the results also found that there are statistically significant differences at the level of (α = 0.05) among the average grades of third-grade secondary school students in deep understanding and achievement in organic chemistry according to their different goal orientation, The results were discussed, recommendations and suggestions were made.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
https://www.moe.gov.sa/ar/news/Pages/G20-2020-20.aspx  
Alkharusi, H. (2008). Effects of classroom assessment practices on students' achievement goals. Educational assessment,13(4), 243-266.
Alshdaifat, F. Talib, A.& Osman, A. (2020). Improved deep learning framework for fish segmentation in underwater videos. Ecological Informatics ,59 ,1-11.
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 267- 271.
Blum, J. (2008). Math/science self-schemas and goal orientations among female undergraduates: building a bridge between current and future selves. A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Education University of Houston. UMI Number: 1461411
Brand C., Massey-Allard J., Perez S., Rummel N.& Roll I (2019). What Inquiry with Virtual Labs Can Learn from Productive Failure: A Theory-Driven Study of Students’ Reflections? In: Isotani S., Millán E., Ogan A., Hastings P., McLaren B., Luckin R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11626. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_6
Button, S., Mathieu, J.& Zajac, D. (1996). Goal orientation in organization research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 26-48.
Bybee, R. (2012). The Next Generation Science Standards: Implications for biology Education. The American Biology Teacher, 74 (8): 542-5449.
Chen, C. & Ge, X. (2006):The Design of a Web-Based Cognitive Modeling System to Support Ill-Structured Problem Solving.British Journal of Educational Technology,37(2):299-302.
Chi, M. T. & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49, 219–243.
Chin, C., & Brown, D.E. (2000): Learning in science A Comparison of Deep surface Approaches.Journal of research in science teaching, 37 (2), 109-138.
Chowrira, S. G., Smith, K. M., Dubois, P. J., & Ido, R. (2019). DIY productive failure: Boosting performance in a large undergraduate biology course. NPJ Science of Learning, 4(1) ,1-8.
Church. M., Elliot, A., & Gable, S. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54.
Dickson, B. ; Weber, J.& Boyd, T.(2020). The role of productive failure in 3D printing in a middle school setting. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(33), 149–159.
Elliot, A., & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1, 218- 232.
Emihovich, B.; Arrington, L.& Xu, X. (2019). Chapter 7 Press Play! How Immersive Environments Support Problem-Solving Skills and Productive Failure in (Advances in Game-Based Learning).
Ford, M. (2015). Educational Implications of Choosing “Practice” to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041- 1048.
Grisham, D., & Wolsey, T. (2014). Podcasting for Deeper Science Learning. California Reader, 47(3), 18–26.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1284-1295.
Heemsoth, T., & Heinze, A. (2014). The impact of incorrect examples on learning fractions: a field experiment with 6th grade students. Instructional Science, 42(4), 639–657.
Huff, S., Stripling, C., Boyer, C., & Stephens, C. (2016). Investigating Factors that Influence Achievement Goal Orientation and Educational Practices in Undergraduate Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resource Students, NACTA Journal, 60(4), 423-431.
Hutagalung, F.; Lee, W.; Simin, H.; Chew, F. & Rosli, N. (2018). Epistemological Beliefs of Secondary School Students: Relation Goal Orientations, Learning Approaches, and Science Achievement. international journal of environmental & science education, 24, 5280-5288.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (2015, October). Socioeconomically disadvantaged students who are academically successful: Examining academic resilience cross-nationally. https://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Policy_Briefs/IEA_policy_brief_Mar2015.pdf.
Kapur, M. & Bielaczyc, K. (2012) Designing for Productive Failure, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45-83.
Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550.
Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022.
Kapur, M. (2015). The preparatory effects of problem solving versus problem posing on learning from instruction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 23–31.
Kennedy-Clark, S. (2009) Designing Failure to Encourage Success: Productive Failure in a Multi-user Virtual Environment to Solve Complex Problems. In: Cress U., Dimitrova V., Specht M. (eds) Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines. EC-TEL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5794. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_56
King, C. (2016): Geoscience education chapter 1 fostering deep understanding through the use of geoscience investigations, models and thought experiments: the earth science education unit and earth learning idea, experiences, Springer Intentional Publishing Switzerland.
Koul, R., Lerdpornkulrat, T. & Poondej, C. (2016). Influence of perceived parenting styles: Goal orientations and career aspirations of high school science students in Thailand. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 15(4),56-65
 Kurt, U. & Taş, Y. (2019). Prediction of students' strategies for doing science homework by parental support and students' goal orientation. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(2), 585-604.
Loibl, K. & Leuders, T. (2019). How to make failure productive: Fostering learning from errors through elaboration prompts. Learning and Instruction, 62(1), 1-10.
Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Knowing what you don’t know makes failure productive. Learning and Instruction, 34, 74–85.
Loibl, K., Roll, I., & Rummel, N. (2017). Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 693–715.
McFarland, M. & Moulds, P. (2007). Leading, Learning and Teaching for Understanding, Journal of Principal Leadership, 7 (9), pp 48-51.
McNamara, D. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51–62.
Middleton, M.& Midgley, C. (2002). Beyond motivation Middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 373-391.
Mupira, P, Ramnarain, U. (2018). The effect of inquiry‐based learning on the achievement goal‐orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of research in science Teaching, 55, 810– 825. 
Pintrich, P. & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Merrill.
Pintrich, P. (2003). Multiple goals and multiple pathways in the development of motivation and self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II, Part 2 (Development and Motivation) 137-153.
Purinton, E. & Burke, M. (2020). Engaging online students: Using a multisensory exercise for deeper, active learning. Marketing Education Review, 30(1), 29–42.
 Ramnarain, U. (2013). The achievement goal orientation of disadvantaged physical sciences students from south africa. Journal of Baltic Science Education ,12(2), 139-151
Sherry, B (2010, February 28). What is Deep Understanding? Learning Zone Mindfully Thinking About Learning. https://bsherry.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/what-is-deep-understanding/
Sins, P.; Van Joolingen, W.; Savelsbergh, E., & Van Hout- Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between student’s achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33,58-77.
Smith, J. (2018). productive failures success makes us feel good, but failures each us valuable lessons. Quality magazine. htttps://www.qualitymag.com/articles/95074-success-makes-us-feel-good-but-failures-teach-us-valuable-lessons
Song, Y. (2018). Improving primary students’ collaborative problem-solving competency in project-based science learning with productive failure instructional design in a seamless learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66,979–1008
Sparks, S. (2019). Networks Help Expand ‘Deeper Learning’ in Schools. Education Week, 39 (11), 6.
Steenhof, N., Woods, N. N., Van Gerven, P., & Mylopoulos, M. (2019). Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning. Advances in health sciences Education: theory and practice, 24(4), 739–749.
Sternberg, R. (1999): Cognitive Psychology.  New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
 Subaşi, M. (2016). The role of motivating tasks and personal goal orientations in students’ coping strategies in science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 1 -17.
Toh, P., Kapur, M (2017). Is having more prerequisite knowledge better for learning from productive failure? Instructional Science. 45, 377–394 .
Trueman, R. (2014). Productive failure in stem education. Journal of educational technology systems, 42(3), 199-214.
Vande Walle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological measurement, 57(6), 995-1015.
Yu, C. & Lee, H. (2020). Creating Change to Improve Science and Mathematics Education: Lessons from Hong Kong. Springer Nature Singapore. ISBN 978-981-15-3155-2 ISBN 978-981-15-3156-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3156-9

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics