The level of possession of science teachers in the middle stage of scientific and engineering practices and their impact on the formation of the positive and applied direction of the STEM approach

Document Type : Original Article

Author

King Saud University

Abstract

 
Abstract:
The aim of the research is to identify the level of science teachers ’possession of scientific and engineering practices at the intermediate level, and to identify the effect of science teachers’ possession of science and engineering practices in the formation of the positive and applied direction of the STEM approach. The researcher relied on the descriptive and analytical approach, and the study was conducted on a random sample of science teachers in Al-Dawadmi Governorate in the Riyadh region, and the sample number was (25). The study tool was the questionnaire. The most important results of the study were: that there are statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) and less between the true averages of the degree to which science teachers in the middle stage possess scientific and engineering practices on the one hand and the hypothetical average on the other hand. There are statistically significant differences at the level (0.05) and less between the true averages of the degree of the effect of science teachers ’possession of scientific and engineering practices in forming the positive trend for the STEM trend. There are statistically significant differences at the level (0.05) and less between the true averages of the degree to which science teachers at the intermediate level possess scientific and engineering practices and its effect on the formation of the applied trend of the STEM approach. The most important recommendations were: Training teachers to use standards for the next generation in science learning, including scientific and engineering practices. Developing solutions to address the lack of educational capabilities and means to assist in the use of scientific and engineering practices as well as the STEM approach.

Keywords

Main Subjects


ثانياً: المَراجِع الأجْنَبِيَّة:
Bybee,  R.  (2011).  Scientific  and  Engineering  practices  in k-12 class  rooms:  understanding  a framework  for  k-12 science education. Science and Childern. 49(4), 10- 15.
Çalisici, H. & Sümen,O. (2016). Pre-Service Teachers' Mind Maps and Opinions on STEM Education Implemented in an Environmental Literacy Course. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, (16) 2 .459-476.
Castronova, M. A. (2018). Examining Teachers' Acceptance of the Next Generation Science Standards: A Study of Teachers' Pedagogical Discontentment and Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Modeling and Argumentation doctoral dissertation, Caldwell University.
Cinar, S. , Pirasa ,N. Sadoglu,G. (2016 ).   Views of Science and Mathematics Pre-service Teachers Regarding STEM, Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(6): 1479-1487.
Conner, L. (2013). Could your School have a STEM Emphasis? Education, Health and Human Development, Journal Article, the from Retrieved Canterbury, of University https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/9103
Edward M. Reeve (2015) STEM Thinking Technology and Engineering Teacher, 8-16.
EFKCorp- Engineering for kids. (2016). Why is STEM Education so important? Retrieved on 20/10/ 2019 from: http:// engineeringfokids. Com/article/.
Fredrick, K. , Pandora,C. (2017) Full STEAM Ahead: Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics in Library Programs and Collection, California: ABC-CLIO.
Kawasaki, J. (2015). Examining Teachers' Goals and Classroom Instruction Around the Science and Engineering Practices in the Next Generation Science Standards. doctoral dissertation, university of California, Los Angeles.
Kendall Hunt. (2016). The Importance of Education.  
http://k12.kendallhunt.Com/blog/importantce – STEM- Education
Krajcik, J., & Merritt, J. (2012). Engaging Student in scientific practices: what does constructing and revising models look like in the science class room? Science Scope, 35 (7) 6-8.
 Kuhn, D., Arvidsson, T., Lesperannce, R., & Corprew, R. (2017). Can Engaging in Science Practices Promote Deep Understanding of Them?. Science Education. 191(2), 232-250.
Lesley ,G; Loren ,N, & Kambria E.(2017). Using Online Simulations to Support the NGSS in Middle School Classrooms. California Classroom Science. May 8.
McDONALD. (2016). STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics, Science Education International (27)4: 530 – 569.
National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A Framework for (k-12) Science Education: practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D. C., National Academy of Science. Retrieved at 13 May 2019  from: www.nap.edu/read/13165.
Osbrone, J. (2014). Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the  challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education.  25(2), 177- 196.
Ostler, Elliott. (2012): 21st Century STEM Education: A Tactical Model for Long-Range Success, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, Vol.( 2) No.( 1), 1-6.
Potter, S. (2014). Teaching biology with engineering practices. (Thesis). Michigan State University.
Qablan, A. (2016). Teaching and learning about science practices: Insights and challenges in professional development. Teacher Development Journal. 20 (1), 76-91.
Quang, L. X. ; Hoang, L. H. ; Chuan, V. D. ; Nam, N. H.; Anh, N.  T.  ;   &  Nhung,  V.  T.  (2015):  Integrated  Science,  Technology,  Engineering  and  Mathematics  (STEM)  Education  through  Active Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese  Schools,  British  Journal  of  Education,  Society  & Behavioural Science, Vol.(11), No.(2), 1-12.
Vasquez, J., Comer, M., & Sneider, C. (2012). STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3-8: Integrating Science technology, engineering and mathematics. Retrieved on 17/10/ 2019 from: http://www.fusdl.org/domain/134
Wilde, C. L. (2018). How Teachers are Making Sense of the Next. Generation Science Standards in Secondary Schools: A Mixed-Methods Study: doctoral dissertation, Califomia state university, san Marcos.
Wingert, K., & Bell, p. (2015). Why should students learn to plan and carry out investigation in science and engineering? Retrieved at  11 /12/ 2019     from