A Study of the Requirements of Applying the Universal Learning Design for Learning among Students with Disabilities in Inclusion Programs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

Abstract
The study aimed to identify the possibility of applying the universal design for learning in inclusion schools, by identifying the competencies of general education teachers and special education teachers to apply the universal design for learning; and to identify the environmental potentials available within schools and the extent of their suitability to apply the universal design for learning. It also aimed to identify the perceptions of normal students and students with disabilities towards the universal learning design for learning. The study sample consisted of 409 middle school teachers (238 general education teachers, and 171 special education teachers), in addition to 172 middle school students (94 normal students, and 78 students with hearing impairment, visual impairment and learning disabilities). The following tools were used: the teachers’ competency scale to apply the universal design for learning in inclusion schools (prepared by the researchers), the scale of students’ perceptions of the universal design for learning in inclusion schools (prepared by the researchers), and the scale of environmental potentials to apply the universal design for learning in inclusion schools (prepared by the researchers). The results of the study indicated that the competencies of general education teachers and special education teachers were low regarding their ability to apply the universal design for learning in inclusion schools. It also referred to the lack of materials and special technological tools necessary to apply the universal design for learning, and the perceptions of normal students and students with disabilities were negative towards the universal design for learning. The results of the study recommended the necessity to include the principles of universal design for learning within teacher preparation programs at colleges of education, and to train in-service teachers on principles of universal design for learning in order to achieve inclusion between general education and special education.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Al Hazmi, A. N., & Ahmad, A. C. (2018). Universal Design for Learning to Support Access to the General Education Curriculum for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. World Journal of Education, 8(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n2p66.
Alnahdi, G. (2014). Assistive Technology in Special Education and the Universal. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18–23.
Alquraini, T. A., & Rao, S. M. (2020). Assessing teachers’ knowledge, readiness, and needs to implement Universal Design for Learning in classrooms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1452298.
 Bendu, C. G. (2015). A Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Based Literature Circle (LC) Model: Effects on Higher-Order Reading Comprehension Skills and Student Engagement in Diverse Sixth-Eighth Grade Classrooms. Master Thesis, 53(9), 1689–1699.      https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Black, R. D., Weinberg, L. A., & Brodwin, M. G. (2015). Universal design for learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptionality Education International, 25(2), 1–26.
Bruno, L. (2019). Teacher candidates’ abilities to develop universal design for learning and universal design for transition lesson plans. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-15.
Cooper-Martin, E. (2014). Evaluation of the Universal Design for Learning Projects.Montgomery County Public Schools (February), 1–45.
Dalton, E. M., Lyner-Cleophas, M., Ferguson, B. T., & McKenzie, J. (2019). Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States. African Journal of Disability, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519
Davies, P. L., Schelly, C. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2013). Measuring the Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning Intervention in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 195–220.
Dolan, R., Hall, T., & Banerjee, M. (2005). Applying principles of universal design to test delivery: The effect of computer-based read-aloud on test performance of high school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Technology, Learning
 and Assessment
, 3(7). Retrieved from http://napoleon.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1660.
Evmenova, A. (2018). Preparing Teachers to Use Universal Design for Learning to Support Diverse Learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2), 147–171.
Flach, T. W. (2006). Application of Differentiation and Universal Design for Learning in the Second Grade Science Curriculum.
Gavin, S. W. (2017). Effectiveness of teacher training on the use of universal design learning strategies with special education students in middle school.‏ Mster Thesis. Faculty of Humboldt State University.
Glaser, K. D. (2017). Teacher Knowledge and Use of Universal Design for Learning.‏ Master thesis. University Park, Illinois.
Goegan, L., Radil, A., & Daniels, L. (2018). Accessibility in Questionnaire Research: Integrating Universal Design to Increase the Participation of Individuals with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(2), 177–190.
Gopinath., P., Sabeea, P. S., & Muthaiah, N. (2014). Universal Design for Learning in Action. IIndiana Journal of Applied Research, 189–191.
Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., Verstichele, M., & Andries, C. (2017). Higher education students with disabilities speaking out: perceived barriers and opportunities of the Universal Design for Learning framework. Disability and Society, 32(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1365695
Gronseth, S. L., & Hutchins, H. M. (2020). Flexibility in Formal Workplace Learning: Technology Applications for Engagement through the Lens of Universal Design for Learning. TechTrends, 64(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00455-6.
 Hayes, C. (2014). Positive and Negative Aspects of Inclusion Services. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals,3,2, 60-65.‏
Hatley, M. (2011). Loyola eCommons What Books Don ’ t Tell You : Teacher-Eye-View of Universal Design for Learning and the Implementation Process.
Izzo, M. V. (2012). Universal design for learning: Enhancing achievement of students with disabilities. Procedia Computer Science, 14(Dsai), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.039
Jordan Anstead, M. E. (2016). Teachers Perceptions of Barriers to Universal Design for Learning. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 131. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1756272818?accountid=9838%5Cnhttp://dc8qa4cy3n.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQuest+Dissertations+%2526+Theses+Glob
Kennette, L. N., & Wilson, N. A. (2019). Universal Design for Learning Universal Design for Learning (UDL): What is it and how do I implement it? Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 12(1), 1–7.
King-Sears, M. E., & Johnson, T. M. (2020). Universal Design for Learning Chemistry Instruction for Students With and Without Learning Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519862608
King-Sears, P. (2014). Introduction to learning disability quarterly special series on universal design for learning: Part one of two. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714528337
Kurtts, S. A. (2006). Universal Design for Learning in Inclusive Classrooms. 1(10), 10–23.
Love, M. L., Baker, J. N., & Devine, S. (2019). Universal Design for Learning: Supporting College Inclusion for Students With Intellectual Disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417722518
Mathews, K. M. (2016). Transformative Models in K-12 Education: The Impact of a Blended Universal Design for Learning Intervention. An Experimental Mixed Methods Study. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, (May), 137. Retrieved from http://login.proxy.library.vanderbilt.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1799049279?accountid=14816%5Cnhttp://sfx.library.vanderbilt.edu/vu?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genre=dissertations+%26+theses&sid=
McGuire, J. (2011). Inclusive college teaching: universal design for instruction and diverse learners. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All: JACCES, 1(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v1i1.80
Novak, K. (2016). UDL Now!: A Teacher’s Guide to Applying Universal Design for Learning in Today’s Classrooms. newyork: CAST Professional Publishing.
Wayside, P. (2016). Instructional Material Universal Design Learning ( UDL ) Questionnaire. New york : Wayside Publishing.
Roberts, K. D., Park, H. J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2011). Universal Design for Instruction in postsecondary education: A systematic review of empirically based articles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 5–15. Retrieved from http://www.ahead.org/uploads/publications/JPED/jped_24_1/JPED 24_1 FINAL DOCUMENT.pdf#page=7
Root, J. R., Cox, S. K., Saunders, A., & Gilley, D. (2019). Applying the Universal Design for Learning Framework to Mathematics Instruction for Learners With Extensive Support Needs. Remedial and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519887235
Rose, D. (2001). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 57–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340101600308
Ross, S. R. (2019). Supporting your neurodiverse student population with the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2019-Octob, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028693
Smith, S. J., & Lowrey, K. A. (2017). Applying the universal design for learning framework for individuals with intellectual disability: The future must be now. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-55.1.48.