References:
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G., Lee, M., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. 86, 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006.
Brown, B., Schroeder, M., & Eaton, S. (2016). Designing Synchronous Online Interactions and Discussions. Doi: 10.11575/PRISM/5325.
Carol R. Rodgers & Miriam B. Raider‐Roth (2006) Presence in teaching, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 12:3, 265-287, doi: 10.1080/13450600500467548.
Cela, K., Sicilia, M., & Sánchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: A preliminary systematic review. 27(1), 219-246 doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0.
Christophel, D. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. 39(4), 323-340. doi:10.1080/03634529009378813.
Dahlstrom-Hakki, I., Alstad, Z., Banerjee, M. (2020). Comparing synchronous and asynchronous online discussions for students with disabilities: The impact of social presence.
150, 103842. doi:
10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103842.
Edwards, O. & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2022). Social presence and teacher involvement: The link with expectancy, task value, and engagement. The Internet and Higher Education 55 (2022) 100869, 1- 11,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100869
Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2018). Exclusively Synchronous Online (VIRI) Learning: The Impact on Student Performance and Engagement Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60-69. doi:10.1177/0273475318818864
Gafni, R., & Geri, N. (2010). The Value of Collaborative E-Learning: Compulsory versus Optional Online Forum Assignments. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 6, 335-343. doi:101319/28945.
Golding, J., & Bretscher, N. (2018). Developing pedagogies for a synchronous online course on teaching pre-university mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 37(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hry010.
Grammens, et al. (2022). A systematic review of teacher roles and competences for teaching synchronously online through videoconferencing technology. Educational Research Review 37 (2022) 100461, 1-16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100461.
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research.
15(1), 69-95. doi:
10.1016/J.HRMR.2005.01.002.
Hjalmarson, M. (2017). Learning to teach mathematics specialists in a synchronous online course: a self-study. 20(3), 281-301. doi: 10.1007/s10857-015-9323-x.
Hur, J., & Brush, T. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K–12 teachers? , 41(3), 279-3030 doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532.
Jiang, M. & Ting, E. (2000). A Study of Factors Influencing Students' Perceived Learning in a Web-Based Course Environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6(4), 317-338. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 1, 2022 from
https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8482/.
Jimenez, A., Boehe, D., Taras, V., & Caprar, D. (2017). Working across boundaries: Current and future perspectives on global virtual teams. 23(4), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.05.001.
Jonassen, D.H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.
Juárez-Díaz, C., & Ojeda-Ruiz, L. (2021). ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN THE STUDENT-TOTEACHER INTERACTION IN ONLINE SYNCHRONOUS SESSIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa | 2021, 5(2), 52-67, https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2021.v5i2.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons, 59 (4), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008
Ke, F. & Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.001
Khlaif, Z., Salha, S., Fareed, S., & Rashed, H. (2021). The hidden shadow of the coronavirus on education in developing countries. Online Learning, 25(1), 269-285. doi:.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2287.
Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005
Krumm, S., Kanthak, J., Hartmann, K., & Hertel, G. (2016). What does it take to be a virtual team player? The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required in virtual teams. 29(2), 123-142. doi:10.1080/08959285.2016.1154061.
Luhrs, C. & McAnally-Salas, L. (2016). Collaboration levels in asynchronous discussion forums:A social network analysis approach. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 14(1), 29-44.
Macià, M., García, I. J. T., & education, t. (2016) .Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. 55, 291-307. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021.
Malik, M., Fatima, G. J. B. o. E., & Research. (2017). E-Learning: Students' Perspectives about Asynchronous and Synchronous Resources at Higher Education Level. 39(2), 183-195. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1210223.
Martin, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Budhrani, K. (2017). Systematic Review of Two Decades (1995 to 2014) of Research on Synchronous Online Learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 3-19. doi:10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807.
Martin, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., & Budhrani, K. (2017). Systematic review of two decades (1995 to 2014) of research on synchronous online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807
Martin, F., & Parker, M. (2014).Use of Synchronous Virtual Classrooms: Why, Who, and How?, MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 10(2), 192-210.
Martin, F., Parker, M., & Deale, D. (2012). Examining Interactivity in Synchronous Virtual Classrooms, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning , 3(13), 227-260.
Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. 40(3), 237-253. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00129-X.
Meneses, A ., Uccelli, P., & Valeri, L. (2023). Teacher Talk and Literacy Gains in Chilean Elementary Students: Teacher Participation, Lexical Diversity, and Instructional Non-present Talk. Linguistics and Education 73, 1- 13,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101145
Molano, S., & Polo, A. (2015). Social network analysis in a learning community. 185, 339-345. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.381.
Molnar, A., & Kearney, R. (2017). A comparison of cognitive presence in asynchronous and synchronous discussions in an online dental hygiene course. 91(3), 14-21. Retrieved from. https://jdh.adha.org/content/91/3/14.short.
Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance In D Keegan (ed) Theoretical Principles of Distance Education pp. 22–38 Routledge.
Moorhouse, B. L., Li, Y., & Walsh, S. (2021). E-classroom interactional competencies: Mediating and assisting language learning during synchronous online lessons. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220985274.
Munkvold, B., & Zigurs, I. (2007). Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams. 44(3), 287-299. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.01.002.
Murphy, C., & Fortner, R. (2014). Impact of instructor intervention on the quality and frequency of student discussion posts in a blended classroom. 10(3). Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no3/abstracts.htm.
Murphy, E., Rodríguez‐Manzanares, M., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. 42(4), 583-591. Retrieved From https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x
Pear, J.J., & Crone-Todd, D.E. (2002). A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction. Computers and Education, 38, 221-231.
Planchard, M., Daniel, K. L., Maroo, J., Mishra, C., & McLean, T. (2015). Homework, motivation, and academic achievement in a college genetics course. Bioscene: Journal Of College Biology Teaching, 41(2), 11-18. Retrieved from http://www.acube.org/bioscene/
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. 35(1), 6-36. doi:10.1145/968464.968467.
Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131
Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning environments. In AIP conference proceedings, 2048. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082050.
Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2016). Investigating teacher presence in courses using synchronous videoconferencing. 37(3), 302-316. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1232157.
Rehn, N., Maor, D., & McConney, A. (2018). The specific skills required of teachers who deliver K–12 distance education courses by synchronous videoconference: Implications for training and professional development. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(4), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1483265
Rinekso AB and Muslim AB (2020) Synchronous online discussion: Teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic. J. Eng. Educ. Society. 5:2. doi: 10.21070/jees.v5i2.646.
Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Expectancy-value theory and its relevance for student motivation and learning. In K. A. Renninger, & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 617–644)
Ruan, L. (2018). Effects of the Combination of Synchronous Web-Based Teaching With Visually Creative Teaching on Art Students' Creativity. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7). doi:10.29333/ejmste/90627.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67, doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sapp, D., & Simon, J., (2005). Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment. 22(4), 471-489. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.005.
Savu, I., Popa, C., & Cotet, C. (2017). Mitigating Friction in Multicultural Virtual Organizations / Teams, Proceedings of the 28th DAAAM International Symposium, pp.0737-0742, B. Katalinic (Ed.), Published by DAAAM International, ISBN 978-3-902734-11-2, ISSN 1726-9679, Vienna, Austria doi: 10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings.104.
Schallert, D., Sanders, A., Williams, K., Seo, E., Yu, L.-T., & Vogler, J. (2015). Does it matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher's contribution to emerging patterns of interactions in online classroom discussions. 82, 315-328. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.019.
Seethamraju, R. (2014). Effectiveness of Using Online Discussion Forum for Case Study Analysis. Education Research International, 2014, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2014/589860.
Shea, P., Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. 9(3), 175-190. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005.
Siddiqui, N., Miah, K., & Ahmad, A. (2019). Peer to Peer Synchronous Interaction and Student Engagement: A Perspective of Postgraduate Management Students in a Developing Country. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(7), 491-498. doi:10.12691/education-7-7-9.
Sidhu, G., Singh, J., Shamida, A., & Singh, G. (2019). Synchronous Online Discussion Forum for Postgraduate Study: A Case Study in Malaysia. ISSN: 0193-4120 Page No. 1842 - 1849. Retrived from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ar&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Sidhu%2C+G.%2C+Singh%2C+J.%2C+Shamida%2C+A.%2C+%26+Singh%2C+G.+%282019%29.+Synchronous+Online+Discussion+Forum+for+Postgraduate+Study%3A+A+Case+Study+in+Malaysia.++ISSN%3A+0193-4120+Page+No.+1842+-+1849.+&btnG=
Spencer, D., & Hiltz, S. (2003). A field study of use of synchronous chat in online courses. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173742.
Sum, et al. (2022). Effects of teachers’ participation in continuing professional development on students’ perceived physical literacy, motivation and enjoyment of physical activity. Revista de Psicodidáctica 27, 176–185,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2022.05.003
Ubell, R. (2011). Virtual team learning. Development and learning in organizaion, 25(1). doi: 10.110/dlo.2011.08125aad.007.
Racheva, Racheva. (2020). Social Aspects of Synchronous Virtual Learning Environments. 2Faculty of Education, Sofia University, Sofia, Bulgaria Wang, C. (2005). Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions. 21(4), 303-313. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00138.x.
Wang, Y. & Chen, N.S. (2007). Online Synchronous Language Learning: SLMS over the Internet. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(3),. Retrieved February 1, 2022 from
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104259/.
Weatherby, K. (2017). Teacher participation in online communities of practice: a mixed-methods study of community, context and practice (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London). Retrieved From Retrieved From https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1566655/.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). 35 years of research on students’ subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look forward. In , vol. 7. Advances in motivation science (pp. 161–198). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
Wu, J. (2017). Teacher's presence in synchronous mobile chats in a Chinese university. The Journal of Asia TEF, 14(4), 778-783. doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2017.14.4.13.778.
Xu, B., Chen, N.-S., Chen, G.(2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. 157, 103956. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956.
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO