The differences in the value systems order between social media addicts and non-social media addicts A comparative field study on a sample of college of basic education students

Document Type : Original Article

Author

department of foundations and educational administrations college of basic education public of authority and applied education and training

Abstract

Abstract
     This study aimed to identify the differences in the values system order in respect to its degree of significance between social networks addicts and non-social networks addicts among students of College of Basic Education in Kuwait. To achieve the objectives of this study, a questionnaire of (43) items was developed by the researcher to measure the significance degree of value system, and the social media addiction scale developed by Al-Menayes (2015), and both tools were distributed on a sample of (834) students at the College of Basic Education.
     Results showed that (54.2%) of the sample were addicted to social networks, and that the order of the value systems in respect to its significance for both social networks addicts and non-social networks addicts was similar, and in the following descending order: religious values, aesthetic values, social values, economic values, and political values. In addition, the study found that there were no statistically significant differences at the level of (α ≤ 0.05) in the aesthetic values between social networks addicts and non-social networks addicts while there were statistically significant differences in the religious values, social values, economic values, political values, and on the total degree between social networks addicts and non-social networks addicts. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


المراجع الأجنبية
Al-Menayes, J. J. (2015). Dimensions of social media addiction among university students in Kuwait. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences4(1), 23-28.
Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2, 175–184.
Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). The relationship  between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem:  Findings from a large national survey. Addictive behaviors64(1), 287- 293.
Baltaci, O. (2019). The Predictive Relationships between the Social Media  Addiction and Social Anxiety, Loneliness, and Happiness. International Journal of Progressive Education15(4), 73-82.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computermediated Communication13(1), 210-230.
Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in human behavior18(5), 553-575.
Chukwuere, J. E., & Chukwuere, P. C. (2017). The impact of social media on social lifestyle: A case study of university female students. Gender and Behaviour15(4), 9966-9981.
Diclemente, C. C. (2018). Addiction and change: How addictions develop and addicted people recover (2nd ed). New York: Guilford Publications.
Enrique, E. (2010). Addiction to new technologies and to online social  networking in young people: A new challenge. Adicciones22(2), 91-95.
Griffiths, M. (2000). Internet addiction-time to be taken seriously? Addiction research8(5), 413-418.
Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Facebook addiction: concerns, criticism, and recommendations—a response to Andreassen and colleagues.   Psychological reports110(2), 518-520.
Halstead, M. & Taylor, M. (1996). Values in Education and Education in Values. London: The Falmer Press.
Hou, Y., Xiong, D., Jiang, T., Song, L., & Wang, Q. (2019). Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace13(1), 1-4.
Kara, A., & Tekin, H. (2017). The Investigation of Human Values Perceived from the Use of Social Media of Secondary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research5(11), 1912-1925. 
Katz, E., Haas, H., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American sociological review, 38(2), 164-181.
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(2), 254–263.
Niemz, K., Griffiths, M., & Banyard, P. (2005). Prevalence of pathological  Internet use among university students and correlations with self-esteem, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), and disinhibition. Cyberpsychology & behavior8(6), 562-570.
Robles, A. (2016). Indicators of social networking addiction in college students from Lima. Revista Digital De Investigacion En Docencia Universitaria10(2), 48-58.
Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in human behavior25(2), 578-586.
Shaffer, H.J. (1996) Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the Internet, and gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(4), 461-469.
Simsek, A., Elciyar, K., & Kizilhan, T. (2019). A comparative study on social media addiction of high school and university students. Contemporary Educational Technology10(2), 106-119.
We Are Social and Hoot Suite. (2019). Global Digital Report. Retrieved from  https://wearesocial.com/global-digital-report-2019
West, R., & Brown, J. (2013). Theory of Addiction. 2nd. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Young, K. (1998). Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour, 1(3), 237-244.
Yu, L., & Shek, D. T. L. (2013). Internet addiction in Hong Kong adolescents: a three-year longitudinal study. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology26(3), 10-17.